How to Easily Promote Fraud Awareness during COVID-19

We may sometimes take for granted the protections we have in place. A well-established compliance program has controls to curb or eliminate instances of fraud, waste, and abuse in the form of a special investigations department, data analytics team, or fraud unit. They are charged with staying current with billing trends, vulnerabilities in systems, and new schemes targeting your membership.

In what I consider a new low, the public health emergency (PHE) has created an environment of new opportunity for scammers to defraud Medicare beneficiaries. Earlier this month, the Office of Inspector General provided new updates on COVID-19 fraud, outlining trends such as:

  • Offers of COVID-19 tests in exchange for personal information
  • A focus on retirement communities, offering COVID-19 tests but instead billing for unnecessary services
  • Fake offers of prescription drug cards
  • Other schemes showcased in OIG video alerts

In light of the PHE, think of how your most vulnerable members have been impacted. Did you increase supplemental benefits last year to assist your frail, confined, lonely members in hopes of improving their well-being? That was before COVID-19. Now imagine how isolated, nervous, and vulnerable they are. Family cannot visit and their social time with friends also has to be limited. We are experiencing a surge in positive cases in Rhode Island, so tougher restrictions were recently implemented. If scammers are aggressively calling, texting, using social media and even going door-to-door, we have to be good neighbors in every sense of the word. 

Even if your fraud unit is up-to-date on these schemes, it is important that this information be shared. Leverage this information to inform your team members, your provider community, and your members. Last month I wrote about culture, so what better way to reinforce that commitment than to hear a leadership reiterate the organization’s commitment to your members, your neighbors? It takes no time to customize messaging for internal distribution, for a provider portal, for on-hold messaging, or for a member newsletter. You care about your community, so spread the word:

  • Be wary of strange, unsolicited phone calls, emails, and visitors
  • Do not share personal information with someone claiming to represent Medicare
  • Work with your physician’s office or your state government on advice for COVID-19 testing
  • Review your Part D Explanations of Benefit for suspicious activity
  • When in doubt, report your suspicion online or by phone at (800) 447-8477

Ask your fraud unit what’s happening in your service area. They should know what local law enforcement has seen and how your members may be vulnerable. Tailor your community messaging with examples so it is relatable and understandable. Promote your own fraud unit’s contact information, and thank them for their extra work during this time. 

Accountability: An Unwritten Element

Last year around this time, we were mulling over the Fall Conference and Webcast delivered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). So much has changed in the way we collaborate and interact with each other, both in our professions and personal lives. With all of us keeping our state and local guidelines in mind, we do our best to keep it compliant so we can stay healthy. The likelihood that we will return to the good old days of Ubering to the CMS Woodlawn office soon are slim.

Since we have a public health emergency that requires us to comply with a set of rules in the spirit of slowing or stopping the spread, I’ve been thinking about accountability. When the unexpected happens, who speaks up? Who takes ownership?

I read a recent compliance and ethics report from LRN which noted that when it comes to compliance failures, a poor culture simply deteriorates standing rules. Culture determines whether policies and guidelines will be followed or ignored. The report also showed that in companies with significant compliance failures, key leaders did not take ownership of the problems. Employees raised concerns and reported either being ignored or pressured to look the other way.

For a policy or a code of conduct to be effective, it cannot simply sit on a shelf. The culture within an organization must promote compliance and ethics to demonstrate accountability. Now that many employees are scattered to the wind, is the corporate culture message getting lost in the fray? If so, I recommend making it a priority to communicate a brief message once a week to remind your team about the organization’s mission, commitment to customers, and culture of compliance. Remember, there is no CMS playbook on culture, but you know it when you see it (and when you don’t!).

How to Spend: MLR and COVID-19

I am reminded of the effect the public health emergency (PHE) has had on 2020 plan spending on a weekly basis. I field numerous questions on what creative spending would fall in line with the permissible flexibilities previously issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). In my opinion, the most creative Medicare Advantage (MA) and Part D stakeholders are in sales and marketing, so perhaps those folks need to have a seat at the table!

In a July post, I mentioned benefit enhancements as the topic became more prevalent in my discussions. I am hard-pressed to identify any plan sponsor who could have forecasted the PHE or the benefit utilization stats that are present today.

This leads us to the importance of medical loss ratio (MLR) and the CMS requirements surrounding it. Section 1857(e)(4) of the Social Security Act (“the Act”) requires MA organizations to maintain a MLR of at least 85%. CMS knows this is a concern of the entire industry, and released some Q&As in July regarding spending related to COVID-19.

More recently, CMS issued an enforcement action related to a MA organization’s failure to maintain a MLR of 85% for three years. This does not happen often, but paired with the PHE, it is a stark reminder that many MA organizations may find themselves under the 85% threshold for the first time this year. My tip: field those creative spending solutions, align them with CMS’ permissive actions guidance, and notify your account manager.

You Don’t Need to Drink the Sea: 2021 Program Audit Protocols 30-day Comment

On June 4, 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services released 95 ever-loving pages of industry comments received for the draft 2021 Program Audit protocol. The document includes their responses and actions taken, including what edits they have made to the 60-day package released a few months ago. In my opinion, there is a general feeling of streamlining and simplification to focus on the agency’s areas of priority. 

As I was pulling out clarifications that I am unsure will end up in any FAQ, methodology, or audit process document, I realized the entire responses document should have a proper place on the shelf along with the finalized protocols. Why? Because not all clarifications provided resulted in changes to instructions or data request information. This document can be helpful in communicating expectations to employees and first tier entities alike. 

While it seems like a lot to digest, there was no sign of eliminating an entire review area, or creating a new care delivery branch of review, which is the current focus at the moment due to the public health emergency. If you reviewed the 60-day package thoroughly, the 74-page crosswalk posted with the 30-day package could be your best friend. Therefore, take the comments, hold a meeting, divide and conquer to make sure your business partners and colleagues understand the changes. Comments on this collection must be received by July 6, 2020.

PRA Listing: 2021 ANOCs and EOCs and Network Adequacy

Over the past month or so, we’ve seen a number of items posted in the Paperwork Reduction Act, or PRA, listing. Today I’m focusing on a couple and provide some thoughts.  

On April 6, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) posted the Annual Notice of Change (ANOC) and Evidence of Coverage (EOC) models along with their summary of changes based on the 60-day Federal Register public comments. The supporting statement packaged with the ANOCs outlined the standard information, including estimates of labor burden. The agency estimates 732 Medicare Advantage (MA) Organizations and 63 Part D sponsor contracts will be responsible for producing ANOCs and EOCs. Hours and wage estimates and total burden of hours are also included. They estimate it will take an average of 12 hours to develop and submit the required information to CMS. This estimate has to include different factors, such as number of plan benefit packages a sponsor has, and the fact that ANOCs are much smaller than EOCs. They again anticipate the average EOC will be 238 pages. 

In recent years, these documents have been posted as final, but are followed by supplemental memoranda with additional corrections. If you notice anything substantively amiss in these documents, alert the agency now, as it may save you time and corrections later. 

Also, on April 6, CMS posted CMS-10636 regarding the triennial network adequacy review. CMS reviews MA provider networks on a 3-year cycle, unless there is an event that triggers an intermediate full network review. According to the agency, when selecting contracts for the triennial review period, they will pull a random sample from the list of active contracts, including contracts that have never undergone a full network review and other active contracts, regardless of when the contract’s last full network review occurred in the Health Plan Management System (HPMS). CMS will review all contracts that have never undergone a full network review in HPMS. In the posted package, CMS removed some references to procedural changes, and they note there are no changes to network adequacy requirements. 

This will be an interesting one to follow, looking at the numbers. As part of the network reviews, they expect to review 140 of an estimated 633 contracts in the first year of the triennial review cycle. Keep in mind, between June 2018 and June 2019, CMS performed full network reviews on 438 of the active contracts at that time. 

Another interesting factor is that CMS has proposed in CMS-4190-P to codify network adequacy methodology for MA plans, including proposing to reduce the required percentage of beneficiaries that must reside within the maximum time and distance standards from 90% to 85%. It is unclear if CMS has data showing if this slight adjustment would help sponsors meet the adequacy requirements, as each rural area tells its own story. We shall see if this provision is finalized.